Literature reviews vs Systematic reviews

When researching a dissertation, thesis, or research project you may be asked to conduct a literature review or a systematic review.

There are important differences between these two kinds of reviews. You will need to clarify which type of review before you start:

Graphic table charting the differences between a systematic review and a literature review.

University of South Caroline (2023) Literature review: know the difference!. Available at: https://uscupstate.libguides.com/c.php?g=627058&p=5986719 (27/06/2023).

Literature reviews

A literature review provides a summary of knowledge on a specific topic, identifying key research in this area as well as identifying gaps, inconsistencies, and need for additional research.

 

Systematic reviews

A systematic review is a specialist type of literature review conducted to address a specific research question. You will aim to find, code, evaluate, and compile all previous research related to your topic using a systematic process.

PICO frameworks are traditionally used for systematic reviews, however a CIMO framework can be more useful for business and management systematic reviews. Download the CIMO framework template to develop your own research question: CIMO framework template

 

Systematic Literature reviews

A systematic literature review combines features of both a literature review and a systematic review.

  • Like a literature review this will provide an overview of existing research relating to a specific topic.
  • Like a systematic review this will follow a structured approach to searching and selecting research relating to a specific topic.
  • A systematic literature review will search across multiple databases and grey literature and will prioritise transparency and replicability.

Reproduced with permission from Bath’s guide to Systematic reviews https://library.bath.ac.uk/systematic-reviews/introduction