We gave them tasks which involved:<\/p>\n
Overall the usability seemed an improvement on Dreamweaver.<\/p>\n
\u201cMuch cleaner. Not so scary looking\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\u201cSimple and straightforward\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The testing has managed us to identify a few issues which we plan to fix or add features in the future including:<\/p>\n
\n
- undo function<\/li>\n
- better visual cues to which sections are being edited<\/li>\n
- improving preview for mobile<\/li>\n
- improving text editing interface<\/li>\n
- using Plain English to refine labels and notifications<\/li>\n
- using effective alerts when deleting content<\/li>\n
- providing contextual support when editing (such as image, copyright and accessibility guidelines<\/a>)<\/li>\n
- better defaults, such as refining character limits<\/li>\n
- less obtrusive messaging<\/li>\n
- refining the user interface with improvement to some layout and buttons.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"