{"id":4589,"date":"2024-07-22T09:41:13","date_gmt":"2024-07-22T08:41:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/specialcollections\/?p=4589"},"modified":"2024-07-22T12:48:41","modified_gmt":"2024-07-22T11:48:41","slug":"history-of-fundraising","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/specialcollections\/2024\/07\/22\/history-of-fundraising\/","title":{"rendered":"History of Fundraising"},"content":{"rendered":"

This blog was originally written in 2022 as part of a series of panels for the ‘Exploring Philanthropy’ exhibition. The panels were written by Rhodri Davies, Pears Fellow at the Centre for Philanthropy, and have been re-published here to support the Exploring Philanthropy virtual exhibition.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The History of Fundraising \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

One of the most important factors in motivating people to give is simply being asked, and fundraising has played a crucial role in the history of philanthropy. Throughout the 17th century, one-off national fundraising appeals known as \u201ccharitable briefs\u201d were issued in response to specific disasters. These were often fires, which caused huge damage and loss of life in towns and cities around the UK. In 1666, for instance, a charitable brief was issued following the Great Fire of London, which succeeded in raising over \u00a316,000.<\/p>\n

It was only with the arrival of new forms of \u201cassociated philanthropy\u201d from the late 17th century, however, that we see a greater degree of organisation and the emergence of entities that look something like what we would think of as modern charities. These entities wasted little time in finding ways to drum up support and resources for their causes, and the 18th and 19th century saw a huge amount of growth and innovation in fundraising.<\/p>\n

From early on it was recognised that the star power of celebrities was a powerful tool: The Foundling Hospital in London, for example, convinced the artist William Hogarth (with a number of his friends) to paint murals in their building, and also had organ in the hospital chapel donated by the composer George Friedrich Handel;\u00a0 on which he gave a performance of Messiah<\/em> in 1750 that raised \u00a3728\u00a0 for the charity.<\/p>\n

\"Engraving<\/a>

Credit: Foundling Hospital, London. Etching by H. Roberts, 1749, after J. Robinson after T. Jacobson. Wellcome Collection. https:\/\/wellcomecollection.org\/works\/zkkcq8hp. Public Domain Image. Titled: This view of the hospital for the reception of exposed and deserted young children erected in pursuance of a Royal Charter granted by his most sacred Majesty King George the 2nd Dated the 17th day of October 1739 is most humbly dedicated to the Governors and Guardians of the said hospital, by their most obedient servant Jeremiah Robinson.<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

Later on in the 19th century, some well-known charity figures such as Thomas Barnado and \u201cGeneral\u201d William Booth became celebrities in their own right, and would sell memorabilia playing on their fame to raise money for their organisations; including postcards, plates and teapots bearing their image, and LP recordings of speeches.<\/p>\n

The Salvation Army under Booth also pioneered other innovative approaches to fundraising. In 1891, they began selling safety matches under the brand \u201cLights in Darkest England\u201d; in part to raise awareness about the plight of young women working in match factories who suffered the horrifying condition known as \u201cphossy jaw\u201d due to prolonged exposure to white phosphorus. The Lights in Darkest England matches were made in factories with better pay and working conditions, and were presented to the public in these terms; making them both an early example of \u201cethical consumerism\u201d and a canny piece of fundraising for the Salvation Army.<\/p>\n

\"Black<\/a>

Credit: The match factory established by the Salvation Army at Lamprell Street in Old Ford, to the north of Bow, in East London on 11 May 1891. This work is in the public domain: https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Salvation_Army_Match_factory.JPG<\/p><\/div>\n

With the growth and development of fundraising came increasing criticism too; from those who complained that the tactics being used were too aggressive, or that organisations were spending too much on fundraising costs. The Times<\/em>, for instance, lamented in 1880 that:<\/p>\n

\u201cWhen a name has been printed on a subscription list, its owner becomes a marked man. He has joined, by his own act, the unhappy class to which an appeal can be made with some chance that it will be met. From that day forward his persecution will never cease<\/em>.\u201d<\/p>\n

Addressing criticisms like these continues to be a challenge for charities today, when competition for limited philanthropic resources is fiercer than ever.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Research and text by Rhodri Davies, Pears Fellow, Centre for Philanthropy<\/strong><\/p>\n