A new paper by Edward Morgan-Jones, Laura Sudulich, Feargal Cochrane and Neophytos Loizides explores citizen preferences about border arrangements in divided societies.
Border arrangements are often critical to the successful negotiation of peace settlements and the broader politics of post-conflict societies. However, developing an understanding of popular preferences about these arrangements is difficult using traditional surveys.
To address this problem the paper’s authors used a conjoint survey experiment to assess preferences about post-Brexit border arrangements in Northern Ireland. They mapped areas of convergence and divergence in the preferences about post-Brexit border arrangements of unionist and nationalist communities, simulated the degree of public support for politically plausible outcomes and identified the border arrangements that both communities could agree upon. In so doing, they outlined an empirical approach to understanding public preferences about border arrangements that could be used to understand the degree of support for similar institutional arrangements in other divided societies.
Co-authored by Edward Morgan-Jones, Laura Sudulich, Feargal Cochrane and Neophytos Loizides, this article is available to read free and in full at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053168020929927