{"id":1592,"date":"2016-04-14T17:52:22","date_gmt":"2016-04-14T16:52:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/?p=1592"},"modified":"2016-04-14T17:52:22","modified_gmt":"2016-04-14T16:52:22","slug":"summary-of-discussion-on-the-duke-of-burgundy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/2016\/04\/14\/summary-of-discussion-on-the-duke-of-burgundy\/","title":{"rendered":"Summary of Discussion on The Duke of Burgundy"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Many thanks to Frances for providing the below summary of the discussion following our most recent screening:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The post-screening discussion of <em>The Duke of Burgundy<\/em> focused primarily on the experience of watching this film, which is quite difficult to describe. The film itself is quite unconventional \u2013 with no firm narrative as such \u2013 and at times this makes for a challenging viewing experience, particularly at the beginning when Cynthia\u2019s treatment of Evelyn appears abusive. Narrative comprehension aside, watching the film is a distinctive experience, with words such as compelling, hypnotic and intense being used to describe our feelings throughout. These affects are emphasised by the intense focus on nature within the film\u2019s imagery and the repetition within the plot (as seen through Evelyn\u2019s and Cynthia\u2019s re-playing of scenarios), with some of these features compared to the work of Stan Brakhage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_8.png\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1594\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1594\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_8.png\" alt=\"Duke DOB_8\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_8.png 640w, https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_8-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_8-500x281.png 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Many of these observations were linked to the fact that <em>Burgundy<\/em> is a sensory experience: it evokes a haptic visuality. This is evident even within the film\u2019s credits, which provide reference for costume, lingerie and perfume. It was noted that the latter is not unprecedented (Audrey Hepburn may have credited her perfumer) but here it seems the emphasis is less on brand potentiality and more on the importance of the film as a sensory engagement with the viewer. This appeal to the senses is evident throughout the film. For example, when the initial ambiguity regarding Evelyn\u2019s and Cynthia\u2019s relationship is resolved, the film focuses on the intimacy and sensual encounters between the couple, as when Evelyn caresses Cynthia\u2019s skin and her silk chemise, passionately whispering (in a voice-over) her devotion and sexual attraction to her lover. Similarly, the texture of clothing is given particular attention. Cynthia\u2019s preparation for the women\u2019s roleplaying is revealed in detail, as she is seen transforming her appearance through tight clothing, make-up and wigs. The camera cuts to close-up and medium shots to portray the details of Cynthia pulling on her stocking over her thigh and putting on her high-heeled shoes. The voyeurism of such images is echoed by Evelyn\u2019s actions, as she watches her lover change through the bedroom keyhole; the detailing of clothes touching skin is revealed to be an integral part of Evelyn\u2019s sexual gratification. As such, Cynthia\u2019s body \u2013 and how she dresses it \u2013 is fetishized on both narrative and visual levels.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_6.png\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1596\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-1596\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_6-300x169.png\" alt=\"Duke DOB_6\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_6-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_6-500x281.png 500w, https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_6.png 640w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>The emphasis the film places upon images of nature \u2013 as well as the titular insect \u2013 enhances this sensory experience further. This is established in the film\u2019s opening shots which show Evelyn seated \u2013 with her back towards us \u2013 within a woodland area. The trickling of the water from the stream and the (unseen) birds in the trees dominant the soundtrack. Interestingly, the film does not resolve the mystery of the identity of this seated figure initially, as the film first cuts to a series of close-ups detailing the running water as it ripples around rocks in the stream. An edit back to the medium to long shot of Evelyn sees her turn her head upwards to the right, which then instigates a cut to a close-up of the sun shining through the trees, with the leaves gently rustling in the breeze. Such imagery helps to conjure up the experience of <em>being<\/em> in such a place: the sounds of wildlife and the smell of the damp soil in the air. This attention to detail is once again mirrored by the importance Evelyn places upon environments, textures, sights and sounds in the creation of her fantasies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The use of this imagery also illuminates several tensions at work within the film\u2019s narrative and its viewing experience. This is embodied by the film\u2019s opening: specific features are depicted in some detail (like the running water) and yet Evelyn\u2019s identity remains obscure and is not initially resolved by her first interactions with Cynthia (we only learn later that these events are orchestrated). More broadly, the film has no real sense of place or time \u2013 despite the detailing of the environment \u2013 and yet the narrative is still anchored by a specificity in locations, with the action occurring between the house, the grounds, the lecture room and the library. The nature scenes evoke connotations of a larger ecology \u2013 of life going on elsewhere \u2013 as is implied by Evelyn\u2019s question during the Lepidoptera lecture about \u2018other regions\u2019. And yet these references to the outside world are contained by the film\u2019s concentration on Evelyn\u2019s and Cynthia\u2019s relationship: the women\u2019s world may be in an unknown location and time, but it is one which is consistent and insular. The intense focus through which we observe Evelyn\u2019s and Cynthia\u2019s lives evokes a feeling of claustrophobia, which is enhanced again through repetition: the lovers re-play their sadomasochistic scenarios again and again (with the same dialogue and actions), and images are also repeated, such as the close-ups of the pinned moths in Cynthia\u2019s study, and the shots which depict Evelyn arriving at the house on her bicycle. This appeal to a sense of claustrophobia parallels Evelyn\u2019s desire to feel smothered by her lover, which culminates in her introduction of the trunk into her sexual activities with Cynthia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">These aspects also point to the tensions which exist between Evelyn and Cynthia, and their relationship to broader ideas about the Gothic heroine. The film complicates our initial assessment of the connection between the women by revealing Cynthia\u2019s apparent maltreatment of her maid to be the carefully choreographed and scripted rituals of Evelyn\u2019s submissive desires. The power dynamics are further complicated by the fact that it is not Evelyn who is therefore the oppressed female protagonist but rather Cynthia, who becomes increasingly uncomfortable and overwhelmed by Evelyn\u2019s insistence on playing these games and controlling Cynthia totally, including how she looks and what she says. Both women, therefore, embody different ideas we have discussed previously about how Gothic heroines are portrayed. Significantly, as with other Gothic films, the house plays an integral part in this: indeed, it is Evelyn\u2019s anticipation from arriving at the front door and being kept waiting before being admitted to the house which a key part of her fantasy, signalling the beginning of her sexual interaction with Cynthia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is also interesting that whilst the intensity \u2013 and potential destruction \u2013 of the women\u2019s relationship is emphasised throughout, <em>Burgundy<\/em> does not follow the peaks and troughs in emotion associated with melodrama and other Gothic films, such as <em>Rebecca<\/em> (1940). The intensity of the above tensions is maintained with only very subtle variations in mood: Cynthia\u2019s emotional breakdown is indicated by several close-up shots of her looking dejected by Evelyn\u2019s escalating requests, criticisms of her performance and feelings of betrayal when it is revealed Evelyn has polished another woman\u2019s boots. Indeed, Cynthia\u2019s apparent revenge for Evelyn\u2019s behaviour is portrayed in an understated manner, as she deliberately wears the pyjamas Evelyn hates (rather than the revealing lingerie) and deviates from Evelyn\u2019s script. The moment does not feature an outpouring of emotion or confrontation but is perhaps even more disturbing because of this: Cynthia covers Evelyn\u2019s mouth with her foot when she attempts to say the lovers\u2019 safe word <em>pinastri<\/em>. Evelyn silently weeps as Cynthia mocks her efforts to stop the roleplay in a scene which depicts the only time Cynthia appears to abuse Evelyn for real.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As argued in the introduction to the film, <em>Burgundy<\/em>\u2019s relationship to the \u2018queerness\u2019 of the Gothic is revealed by these tensions, which act as reminders to the importance of the Gothic heroine within these discussions on the genre as a mode of storytelling. <em>Burgundy<\/em> takes these discussions further by challenging our assumptions and previous experience of who the Gothic heroine is and the relationship she has with the house. This point is underlined by the film\u2019s ambiguous ending. Diane Waldman argues that, within the Hollywood Gothic films of the 1940s, the ending would reveal whether the heroine\u2019s perspective had been validated or invalidated (a conclusion reflected by whether the film was pre or post-war) (Waldman, 1984). In <em>Burgundy<\/em>, it is difficult to ascertain whose perspective has been \u2018validated\u2019 and whether the film\u2019s (and its characters\u2019) investigation into the women\u2019s relationship has actually revealed and resolved anything. In the final scenes, Cynthia finally breaks into tears and Evelyn begs her forgiveness and love saying she will do \u2018anything\u2019 to prove her devotion. The following montage shows the women sleeping in the bed together, the trunk being removed and Evelyn\u2019s scripts and instructions being burnt. There seems to be a fresh understanding between the women and a renewed affection, as reflected by the shots which superimpose the women\u2019s faces during their embrace. A voice-over narration hears Evelyn reassure Cynthia that \u2018everything is fine\u2019. Yet this montage ends with an edit to Evelyn seated back within the woodland area, with only the sounds of her environment audible on the soundtrack. The roleplaying game \u2013 and the film \u2013 repeats again, with Evelyn cycling towards the house and Cynthia putting on her tight skirt and wig. Significantly, we do not dwell on the moment Evelyn arrives and is kept waiting at the door \u2013 an action we know from previous occurrences is integral to Evelyn\u2019s gratification. Rather, the final shot focuses on Cynthia as she gazes longingly into the mirror. It is an ambiguous moment which questions Evelyn\u2019s assertion that \u2018everything is fine\u2019: is Evelyn controlling an unwilling Cynthia again? Will these actions inevitably follow the tensions previously experienced? Or have the women established a relationship based on equality and mutual respect and understanding? <em>Burgundy<\/em> once again subverts expectations and, in a truly Gothic manner, leaves such meanings up to personal interpretation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_7.png\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1595\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1595\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_7.png\" alt=\"Duke DOB_7\" width=\"640\" height=\"360\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_7.png 640w, https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_7-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/files\/2016\/04\/Duke-DOB_7-500x281.png 500w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<p>References<\/p>\n<p>Waldman, D. (1984). \u201cAt last I can tell it to someone!\u201d Feminine Point of View and Subjectivity in the Gothic Romance Film of the 1940s.\u201d <em>Cinema Journal<\/em>, 23 (2): 29-40.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Many thanks to Frances for providing the below summary of the discussion following our most recent screening: The post-screening discussion of The Duke of Burgundy focused primarily on the experience of watching this film, which is quite difficult to describe. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/2016\/04\/14\/summary-of-discussion-on-the-duke-of-burgundy\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5401,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[50576],"tags":[100240,5083,100302,100290,92811,100301,100270],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1592"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5401"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1592"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1592\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1597,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1592\/revisions\/1597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1592"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1592"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/melodramaresearchgroup\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1592"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}