{"id":13,"date":"2024-07-31T14:35:58","date_gmt":"2024-07-31T13:35:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/?page_id=13"},"modified":"2025-01-22T10:42:10","modified_gmt":"2025-01-22T10:42:10","slug":"ebl","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/ebl\/","title":{"rendered":"EBL+"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Evidence-based law (EBL) is an emerging field that seeks to use the best available evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed laws and regulations. It can answer questions such as: is banning mobile phone use while driving an effective way to reduce accidents?<\/p>\n<p>Proponents of EBL recognise the need to base judgements of effectiveness on diverse kinds of evidence. However, they currently lack a systematic account of which kinds of evidence to look for, and how best to integrate the evidence.<\/p>\n<p><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/jonwilliamson.uk\/projects\/images\/EBLlogo.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p>In a <a href=\"https:\/\/jonwilliamson.uk\/projects\/eblplus\">research project<\/a>, we argue that Evidential Pluralism can provide systematic foundations for EBL. We call this approach &#8216;EBL+&#8217;. This project is supported by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.leverhulme.ac.uk\/\">Leverhulme Trust<\/a> and runs for 3 years from 1st May 2023. The investigators are <a href=\"https:\/\/philpeople.org\/profiles\/alexandra-trofimov\">Alexandra Trofimov<\/a> (RA) and <a href=\"https:\/\/jonwilliamson.uk\/\">Jon Williamson<\/a> (PI).<\/p>\n<p>For an introduction to EBL+, see:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">Alexandra Trofimov: <strong>Evidential Pluralism as a methodology for Evidence-Based Law<\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/thereasoner\/files\/2024\/07\/TheReasoner-184.pdf\"><em>The Reasoner<\/em> 18(4)<\/a>: 30-31, 2024.<\/p>\n<p>For a more detailed overview, see:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">Alexandra Trofimov and Jon Williamson: <strong><a title=\"Evidence-based law seeks to make best use of evidence to assess the effectiveness of laws and regulations. The question arises as to how exactly to make best use of evidence. This paper argues that Evidential Pluralism provides an answer to this question, and can thus provide philosophical foundations for evidence-based law. Evidential Pluralism is a theory of causal enquiry which maintains that one needs to scrutinise mechanistic studies alongside the experimental and observational studies that are the focus of present-day evidence-based medicine and evidence-based policy. The paper develops a new approach to evidence-based law, called EBL+, based on the principles of Evidential Pluralism. Three examples show how the proposed methods work: banning hand-held mobile phone use while driving, sugar tax, and face-mask mandates for controlling Covid-19.\">Applying Evidential Pluralism to evidence-based law: EBL+<\/a><\/strong>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/journals\/rjpn20\"><em>Jurisprudence<\/em><\/a>. Open access. Doi <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/20403313.2025.2449758\">10.1080\/20403313.2025.<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Please see the <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/papers\/\">Papers page<\/a> for more references.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Evidence-based law (EBL) is an emerging field that seeks to use the best available evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of&hellip; <a class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/ebl\/\">Read more <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">EBL+<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40779,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40779"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":188,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/13\/revisions\/188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/evidential-pluralism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}