{"id":645,"date":"2014-10-15T08:55:57","date_gmt":"2014-10-15T08:55:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/?p=645"},"modified":"2014-10-15T08:55:57","modified_gmt":"2014-10-15T08:55:57","slug":"cognitive-approaches-to-audience-and-emotion-historical-perspectives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/2014\/10\/15\/cognitive-approaches-to-audience-and-emotion-historical-perspectives\/","title":{"rendered":"Cognitive approaches to audience and emotion: historical perspectives"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>A colloquium sponsored by<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The Centre for Cognition, Kinesthetics and Performance and The Beacon Institute <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Department of Drama and Theatre,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>University of Kent<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>October 28, 18:00 \u2013 20:00<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Jarman 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Speakers:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Angeliki Varakis-Martin (Lecturer in Drama)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Positive emotion and cognition in the spectating of Aristophanic comedy<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>What can positive psychology tell us about the ancient audience\u2019s experience of Aristophanic comedy?<\/p>\n<p>Drawing on research in the field of cognitive science which has shown that \u2018thinking\u2019 is not detached from emotion I shall argue that comic laughter, as an embodied experience, does not disrupt concentration but instead facilitates a different and more broadened mode of attention which affects the way in which theatre audiences perceive their surrounding environment. In the context of Aristophanic theatre, a broadening of attention would have facilitated audiences to experience the comedy of Aristophanes as an expansive and unpredictable world.\u00a0 This was in tune with the \u2018openess\u2019 of Aristophanic comedy as expressed through its discontinuous narrative, multiplicity of action and \u2018re-creative\u2019 characters.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Angeliki Varakis-Martin<\/strong> is Lecturer in drama at the University of Kent since 2007.\u00a0 Research interests include masked acting, the theatre of Aristophanes and 20<sup>th<\/sup> century approaches to the staging of Ancient Greek drama on the Modern Greek stage. She has published work on the Greek mask, the Aristophanic body and on Greek director Karolos Koun. \u00a0Past essays and articles include &#8216;The use of Masks in Koun&#8217;s stage interpretations of Birds, Frogs and Peace &#8216; in Hall, Wrigley <em>Aristophanes in Performance 421 BC-2005 AD,<\/em> (2007), &#8216;Body and Mask in Performances of Classical Drama on the Modern Stage&#8217; in Hardwick, Stray <em>A Companion to Classical Receptions<\/em> (2008) \u00a0&#8216;Body and Mask in Aristophanic performance&#8217; BICS-53-1 (<em>Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies<\/em>) 17-38 (2010) &#8216;Aristophanic Performance as an all-inclusive event: audience participation and celebration in the modern staging of Aristophanic comedy <em>Classics in the Modern World: A democratic turn?<\/em>\u00a0 (2013). She is currently co-authoring a book on Greek director Karolos Koun and his work on Ancient Greek theatre.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Robert Shaughnessy (Professor of Theatre)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Connecting the Globe: actors, audience and entrainment<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>One of the least anticipated aspects of the reconstructed Shakespeare\u2019s Globe on Bankside since it opened in 1997 has been its radical redefinition of the actor-audience relationship. The Globe\u2019s characteristic mode of buttonholing give-and-take between actor and spectator, in the context of a visible, demonstrative and collectively-minded audience, is generally agreed to be its most involving, challenging and, much more debatably, \u2018authentic\u2019 feature.\u00a0 More than that, performers testify to the experience of feeling at once \u2018as one\u2019 with their audiences and deeply challenged by them, to extraordinary levels of arousal coupled with potentially overwhelming levels of exposure and risk. My paper addresses this aspect of Globe performance as a theatrical example of group entrainment, involving both behavioural synchrony and emotional contagion. In particular, I examine actors\u2019 accounts of their work that explore how the Globe experiment is not only a shared game but also a struggle for control.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Robert Shaughnessy<\/strong> has been Professor of Theatre at the University of Kent since 2004, having previously taught at the University of Roehampton.\u00a0 He has published extensively in the areas of contemporary and early modern theatre, including work on a wide variety of playwrights (ranging from Edward Bond and Howard Barker to Ben Jonson and Shakespeare), practitioners (from Tyrone Guthrie to Complicite), and performers (from Margaret Woffington to Johnny Cash). His books include <em>The Shakespeare Effect <\/em>(2002), <em>The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Popular Culture <\/em>(2007), the volume on Margaret Woffington in the <em>Lives of Shakespearean Actors <\/em>series (2008), and <em>The Routledge Guide to William Shakespeare<\/em> (2011). Recent essays and articles include work on backstage theatre tours, the performing prosthetic body, the predicament of the Shakespearean understudy, <em>Hamlet<\/em> and the art of the British political cartoon, and the politics of Shakespearean silences.\u00a0 He is currently writing a performance history of <em>As You Like It<\/em>, and developing a collaborative investigation of Relaxed Performance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A colloquium sponsored by The Centre for Cognition, Kinesthetics and Performance and The Beacon Institute Department of Drama and Theatre, University of Kent October 28, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/2014\/10\/15\/cognitive-approaches-to-audience-and-emotion-historical-perspectives\/\">Read&nbsp;more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39610,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[84091,50018],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/645"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39610"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=645"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/645\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":646,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/645\/revisions\/646"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.kent.ac.uk\/arts-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}